<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Algorithm and Axiomatic Set Theory</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.search3w.com/google-uncover/google-algorithm-and-axiomatic-set-theory/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.search3w.com/google-uncover/google-algorithm-and-axiomatic-set-theory/</link>
	<description>Forum Is Dead. Long Live Blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 08:54:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Search Engine Solutions Blog &#187; MYTH: SEO is not an exact science</title>
		<link>http://blog.search3w.com/google-uncover/google-algorithm-and-axiomatic-set-theory/comment-page-1/#comment-93</link>
		<dc:creator>Search Engine Solutions Blog &#187; MYTH: SEO is not an exact science</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Aug 2006 22:41:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.acroterion.ca/google-uncover/google-algorithm-and-axiomatic-set-theory/#comment-93</guid>
		<description>[...] Not true. The term SEO is not an exact science, it is using by Search Engines Marketers who do not fully understand how search engines works. It is pure and simple mathematics if you know how to do it. It is also true that the science of mathematics  in general and Google in particular includes many grey areas such as Google Algorithm and Axiomatic Set Theory and more, but how do you think Google, Ask, Yahoo and MSN retrieve, sort and score the results sets for a given query? By a theory, or by a guess?! Ah, you might say that search engines optimization is not the same as search engines, not a paradox?  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Not true. The term SEO is not an exact science, it is using by Search Engines Marketers who do not fully understand how search engines works. It is pure and simple mathematics if you know how to do it. It is also true that the science of mathematics  in general and Google in particular includes many grey areas such as Google Algorithm and Axiomatic Set Theory and more, but how do you think Google, Ask, Yahoo and MSN retrieve, sort and score the results sets for a given query? By a theory, or by a guess?! Ah, you might say that search engines optimization is not the same as search engines, not a paradox?  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
